The ruling African National Congress (ANC) has won South Africa‘s parliamentary elections with 57.5 percent of the vote, the electoral commision said, announcing the offical results.
Saturday’s win assured a sixth straight term in power for the ANC. But the result was the worst-ever electoral showing for the party, which has ruled South Africa since the end of apartheid 25 years ago.
Support for the ANC, which gained 62 percent in the previous election in 2014, has steadily declined since it took a record 69 percent of the vote in 2004. Saturday’s electoral showing comes amid growing voter frustration over rampant corruption and high rates of unemployment.
President Cyril Ramaphosa, who replaced scandal-plagued Jacob Zuma last year, now faces the challenge of regaining public confidence in a party that remains beset with internal divisions and oversaw a raft of economic crises in the country.
The result, which gives the ANC 230 seats in the 400-member parliament, will also renew pressure on Ramaphosa to decisively deal with cabinet ministers accused of corruption.
In a victory speech in the northern city of Pretoria, Ramaphosa said the election confirmed “freedom and democracy reign” in South Africa. “Our people have given all of the leaders of our country a firm mandate to build a better South Africa for all.”
Earlier in the day, Jessie Duarte, ANC deputy secretary-general, struck a more sombre tone, saying the party would move swiftly to counter corruption and increase economic growth.
“We need to correct our mistakes,” she said, adding that the election showed voters want an “ANC that is united and in its unity [and] remains true to the values and principles on which it was founded.”
‘Turned on by politics’
|
George Mthembu, who voted for the ANC, said he cast his ballot for his children.
“I know what my vote means,” the unemployed resident of Johannesburg said.
“Even if we are unhappy with the way things are now, I remember where we came from during apartheid,” he said reffering to the decades long of white-minority rule in South Africa.
But Marks Qhapelani, an Uber driver from Orange Grove in Johannesburg who cast his ballot for the opposition Democratic Alliance (DA), said he wanted change.
“I always voted ANC, but I had to vote for something different, because nothing is going to change with the ANC in power,” he said.
“You only see the ANC for elections, then we’ll have nothing from them for the next five years.”
The DA won 20.77 percent of the vote, a two percent dip from 2014. However, it maintained its grip on the Western Cape province, which includes the city of Cape Town.
On Friday, Mmusi Maimane, the DA leader, said he was confident the party will continue to grow and do well in future votes.
“Give us until 2021 and 2024. We can demonstrate that we can hold all South Africans together,” he said.
The results also showed significant gains for the far-left Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), which, with almost 11 percent of the vote, polled about five percentage points higher than in its first election in 2014. The EFF is now the official opposition in three out of South Africa’s nine provinces.
On the other side of the political spectrum, there were notable advances for the right-wing Freedom Front Plus, which took 10 seats in the parliament, up from four in the previous election.
Despite a number of interruptions and claims of electoral fraud and insufficient ballot papers at certain voting stations across the country, international and domestic election observers have endorsed the elections as free and fair.
Overall voter turnout stood at 65 percent, with more than half of eligible voters under 30 years of age failing to register to vote.
Sheila Meintjes, an associate professor of political studies at the University of Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, noted that the overall turnout was higher than in a number of recent elections in Western countries including the United States and the United Kingdom.
“This shows that we’re still a country that is turned on by politics,” she told Al Jazeera.
But Tumi Jonas, a 32-year-old academic based in Cape Town, who voted for the radical Black First Land First, one of a number of new small parties on the ballot, said the election had “felt like an empty spectacle”.
“This is my third time voting, and I’ve never felt so despondent about the whole thing. It’s just going to be more of the same. I’m not feeling very hopeful about the future. I don’t think our electoral system is really working for a lot of people,” Jonas said.
SOURCE: AL JAZEERA NEWS
US sends Patriot missiles, warship to Middle East to deter Iran
USS Arlington carrying Patriot missiles to join USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group, currently in the Red Sea.
The US government has approved the deployment of a Patriot missile defence battery and another warship to the Middle East amid increasing tensions between the US and Iran.
The USS Arlington, which transports marines, amphibious vehicles, and rotary aircraft, as well as the Patriot missiles, will join the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group, which already passed through Egypt’s Suez Canal on Thursday, and is currently sailing in the Red Sea, according to CNN.
The US says the deployments of military hardware to the region comes in response to “heightened Iranian readiness to conduct offensive operations”.
The Patriot missile system is a defence mechanism against aircraft, drones, cruise missiles and ballistic missiles, and is currently deployed in Bahrain, Jordan, Kuwait, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
“The Acting Secretary of Defense has approved the movement of USS Arlington (LPD-24) and a Patriot battery to US Central Command (CENTCOM) as part of the command’s original request for forces from earlier this week,” a Pentagon statement said.
USS Arlington is an amphibious transport dock carrying hundreds of Marines [Bebeto Matthews/AP] |
Manufactured by Raytheon, the Patriot is used by the US and several allied nations [File: EPA] |
Earlier in the week, a US air force bomber task force, including B-52 bombers, also arrived at the US airbase Al Udeid in Qatar, US Central Command said.
“The Department of Defense continues to closely monitor the activities of the Iranian regime, their military and proxies. Due to operational security, we will not discuss timelines or location of forces. The United States does not seek conflict with Iran, but we are postured and ready to defend US forces and interests in the region,” the statement added.
The B-52 is a long-range bomber designed and built by Boeing [File: Kim Hong-Ji/Reuters] |
Iran has dismissed the moves as “psychological warfare” designed to intimidate it.
In an advisory posted on Thursday, the US Maritime Administration (MARAD) said that since early May there had been an increased possibility of Iran or its regional proxies taking action against US and partner interests.
These included, MARAD said, oil production infrastructure, after Tehran threatened to close the vital Strait of Hormuz chokepoint in the Arabian Gulf through which about a fifth of oil consumed globally passes.
“Iran or its proxies could respond by targeting commercial vessels, including oil tankers, or US military vessels in the Red Sea or the Persian Gulf,” MARAD said.
“Reporting indicates heightened Iranian readiness to conduct offensive operations against US forces and interests.”
Rising tensions
Tensions between Iran and the US have escalated sharply in recent weeks.
The US unilaterally backed out of a 2015 nuclear pact in May 2018, effectively giving countries worldwide a year to stop buying Iranian oil or face US sanctions, which Washington says are aimed at completely choking off Iranian crude exports.
Washington last month blacklisted Iran’s Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist group.
US officials say they have detected indications that Iran could be preparing a military response.
Speaking on condition of anonymity to Reuters news agency, officials say one of the pieces of intelligence indicated Iran had moved missiles on boats, with giving details of the claim.
One of the officials said the particular missile observed was perhaps capable of launching from a small ship.
The officials also noted growing concerns about the threat from Iran-backed militia in Iraq, which have long avoided any confrontation with US troops under the shared goal of defeating the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, or ISIS).
Rhetoric has grown heated on both sides.
Iranian news agency ISNA quoted Ayatollah Tabatabai-Nejad in the city of Isfahan as saying: “Their billion dollar fleet can be destroyed with one missile.
“If they attempt any move, they will … (face) dozens of missiles because at that time (government) officials won’t be in charge to act cautiously, but instead things will be in the hands of our beloved leader (Ayatollah Ali Khamenei),” he said on Friday.
Thousands of Iranians took part in marches on Friday to support the government’s decision to reduce limits on its nuclear programme. Iran has threatened to go further if other parties to the 2015 deal – Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia – fail to shield it from US sanctions.
Iranian TV channels showed protesters marching after Friday prayers in Tehran and said similar marches had been held across Iran.