A viral video featuring the teenage daughter of convicted Ghanaian evangelist Nana Agradaa has ignited a firestorm of online reactions, particularly from controversial preacher Prophet Kumchacha.
The video, which surfaced on July 19, 2025, shows the young girl pleading with the court to pardon her mother, who is currently serving a 15-year prison sentence. In the emotional video, the teenager opens up about the profound emotional toll her mother’s imprisonment has had on her life. With tearful eyes and a heart-rending appeal, the girl asks the public and authorities to show mercy on Nana Agradaa, whose legal troubles have attracted significant media attention in Ghana.
While the raw emotions of the child quickly captured the public’s attention, the video has sparked heated debate, with many questioning whether it was appropriate for a minor to be involved in such a sensitive matter.
One of the most vocal critics of the video was Prophet Kumchacha, a well-known and outspoken Ghanaian preacher. In a post shared on social media on July 20, the prophet expressed his disapproval, calling the decision to feature the young girl in the public plea “dumb.” Kumchacha pointed the finger at Nana Agradaa’s husband, Angel Asiamah, whom he believes may have orchestrated the video in an attempt to garner public sympathy.
“Asiamah, be sensible. There are a lot of people in Nsawam prison for stealing. Some are even there in jail for stealing a tuber of cassava. If you want public sympathy, all you need is a good lawyer,” Kumchacha wrote, referring to the broader issue of people serving time for minor offenses.
However, Kumchacha’s most pointed critique was centered on the long-term emotional and psychological effects that the public exposure could have on the teenage girl. He warned that involving a child in such a personal and controversial matter could cause lasting damage to her well-being and future.
“Don’t you know you are destroying the small girl’s future? She is even a minor. Involving her in this issue can destroy her life because social media doesn’t forget,” Kumchacha cautioned, highlighting the potential consequences of the video’s widespread circulation online.
Since the video’s release, social media has been abuzz with differing opinions. While some have expressed sympathy for the child’s pain and understand the emotional appeal, many others have condemned the decision to use her in such a vulnerable public manner. Critics argue that children, particularly minors, should be protected from such adult issues, and that their involvement in such sensitive matters can lead to long-lasting personal and reputational harm.
The video has also led to wider discussions about the ethics of using children to gain public support, especially in the context of criminal cases and controversial legal proceedings. While some empathize with the teenager’s situation and the hardship of growing up with an incarcerated parent, others believe that such emotional pleas should not come at the expense of a minor’s privacy and mental health.
As the video continues to circulate and gain attention, one thing is clear: this incident has stirred a complex conversation about the boundaries of public involvement in sensitive personal matters. The debate surrounding the use of a minor in Nana Agradaa’s pardon appeal serves as a stark reminder of the potential risks associated with exposing children to public scrutiny, particularly in the age of viral content.
With public opinion sharply divided, many are calling for a more responsible approach when it comes to involving minors in public matters, urging families to carefully consider the long-term impact on their children’s well-being before using them as part of a public appeal.
Source: http://thepressradio.com
