Connect with us

Finance

Why 21% VAT on Facebook and Instagram advertising in Ghana is ‘evil’

Published

on

In a world where digital advertising is increasingly crucial for businesses, Ghana’s 21% Value-Added Tax (VAT) on Facebook and Instagram ads poses a significant challenge. This draconian policy not only threatens to cripple small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) but also undermines Ghana’s aspirations to become a hub for innovation and entrepreneurship.

VAT on Digital Advertising: A Global Perspective

Growing Trend: A number of countries have implemented VAT on digital advertising services provided by foreign tech giants. This trend underscores efforts to ensure fair taxation in a changing economy.

Varying Rates: VAT rates on digital advertising differ across nations. For example:

Nigeria: 7.5%

South Africa: 15%

Kenya: 16%

Ghana: 21%

European Union: Rates vary by advertiser’s location.

The Ghanaian Context

Ghana’s 21% VAT on Facebook and Instagram ads is notably high compared to regional and global peers. This has several implications:

Increased Costs for Businesses: The added tax burden significantly increases the cost of digital advertising, disproportionately affecting smaller businesses that rely heavily on these platforms.

Disincentivizing Growth: High advertising costs could discourage businesses from investing in digital marketing, hindering their ability to reach wider audiences and grow their operations.

Competitiveness Concerns: Ghanaian businesses may find themselves at a disadvantage compared to businesses in countries with lower or no VAT on digital advertising.

Potential for Stifling Innovation: The increased financial pressure could limit experimentation and risk-taking with digital marketing strategies, potentially curtailing innovation.

Is It Evil?

The 21% VAT rate does present a serious obstacle to businesses in Ghana. Here’s why a more nuanced perspective is needed:

The Ghanaian government’s imposition of a hefty 21% Value Added Tax (VAT) on Facebook and Instagram advertising is a blatant cash grab that threatens to cripple small businesses and stifle innovation in the digital marketing space. Under the flimsy guise of revenue generation and leveling the playing field, this draconian policy aims to squeeze more taxes out of a rapidly growing industry.

This VAT hike is a stark departure from the government’s lip service about fostering an enabling environment for businesses to thrive. Instead of nurturing homegrown enterprises, it erects formidable barriers that disproportionately impact small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) operating on shoestring budgets. For many of these businesses, Facebook and Instagram advertising represent cost-effective lifelines to reach their target audiences in an increasingly competitive digital landscape.

The Way Forward

In the face of the proposed digital marketing tax in Ghana, a measured and calculated response is essential to ensure that concerns are heard and addressed without exacerbating tensions. Rather than resorting to outright condemnation, a constructive approach is needed to engage policymakers in a meaningful dialogue that seeks to find a mutually acceptable solution.

The first step in this process is to foster a sense of unity among Ghanaian businesses and citizens. By coming together as a collective voice, they can amplify their concerns and demonstrate the widespread opposition to the proposed tax. This can be achieved through peaceful protests, lobbying efforts, and the creation of awareness campaigns that highlight the negative implications of the tax on the digital marketing landscape in Ghana.

It is crucial to engage in constructive dialogue with policymakers. This involves presenting well-reasoned arguments, backed by data and evidence that demonstrate the potential harm the tax could inflict on the Ghanaian economy. Emphasizing the stifling effect it would have on innovation, job creation, and the country’s aspirations to become a regional hub for digital marketing can help policymakers understand the broader implications of their decision.

Furthermore, it is essential to offer feasible alternatives to the proposed tax. By suggesting alternative revenue-generating measures that are less harmful to the digital economy, policymakers can be presented with a range of options that align with Ghana’s long-term economic goals.

By adopting a constructive approach, Ghanaian businesses and citizens can increase the likelihood of being heard and having their concerns taken seriously. It is through open dialogue, mutual understanding and a shared commitment to Ghana’s economic future that a solution that benefits all stakeholders can be found.
In Summary

Review and Benchmarking: The government could reassess the VAT rate in light of international practices, seeking a balance between revenue generation and promoting business growth.

Support for Small Businesses: Programs or subsidies could be designed to offset the higher advertising costs for SMEs, fostering a more equitable environment.

Dialogue and Collaboration: A collaborative approach between businesses, policymakers, and tech companies could lead to a solution that supports the digital economy’s growth while ensuring fair taxation.

 

Source: Edward Worlanyo Bankas, Contributor

Verified by MonsterInsights