Popular social-media personality Agradaa was recently sentenced to 15 years in prison for fraud and deceptive advertisement practices. Following the verdict, legal experts are cautioning that her decision to appeal the court’s ruling could potentially result in a longer jail term, rather than a reduction in her sentence.
According to lawyers, under Ghanaian law, appealing a conviction does not guarantee leniency. In some cases, an appeal may prompt the courts to increase the original sentence, especially if new factors or aggravating circumstances are presented during the appeal process. This has sparked widespread discussion about the legal risks involved in challenging court decisions.
Agradaa, who gained prominence as a spiritual influencer, has become the centre of national attention, with many observing the case as an example of accountability for public figures who promote services that may be fraudulent or misleading. Legal commentators note that the appeal process could have serious consequences, potentially setting a precedent for how appeals in similar fraud cases are handled in the future.
The case has also prompted debates among Ghanaian social-media users, entertainment fans, and legal analysts about the responsibilities of influencers and the importance of adhering to legal standards when offering products or services to the public.
As Agradaa prepares to take her appeal to a higher court, the outcome remains uncertain. The legal community and public alike are watching closely to see whether the appeal will succeed in overturning or reducing the sentence, or whether it will inadvertently lead to an even longer jail term.
Watch the video below:
View this post on Instagram
Source: Thepressradio.com
