In the vast and diverse landscape of South Africa, a nation celebrated for its post-apartheid “Rainbow Nation” identity, there exists a town that stands as a stark anomaly: Orania. Located in the Northern Cape province along the Orange River, Orania is a privately-owned Afrikaner-only town that has garnered significant attention and controversy for its stated mission of Afrikaner cultural self-determination, which in practice leads to the exclusion of non-white residents.
Orania was founded in 1991 by a group of Afrikaners, led by Carel Boshoff, the son-in-law of Hendrik Verwoerd, a key architect of apartheid. The initial aim was to create a “Volkstaat” (people’s state) – a self-governing community where Afrikaner culture, language, and heritage could be preserved and protected. The town operates under a unique legal status, leveraging Section 235 of the South African Constitution, which grants the right to self-determination for cultural groups.
While Orania’s leadership insists that their town is not based on racial exclusion but on cultural preservation, the reality on the ground is that only approved Afrikaners who share the town’s vision can take up residency. This effectively means that non-white individuals are not permitted to live or own property in Orania. Although there is no explicit law banning black residents, the application and vetting process for residency, which emphasizes Afrikaner culture, language fluency, and a shared value system, ensures that only those who fit this specific profile are accepted. As a result, Orania remains overwhelmingly white, with census data reflecting a demographic of over 97% white residents.
A central tenet of Orania’s philosophy is “selfwerksaamheid” (self-reliance), meaning all work, from manual labor to professional services, is performed by the Afrikaner residents themselves. This contrasts sharply with the historical labor practices in South Africa, where white-owned businesses traditionally relied on cheap black labor. Orania’s proponents argue that this practice is a “reformative” shift, aimed at fostering genuine self-sufficiency rather than exploiting others.
The town has its own flag, currency (the “Ora,” backed by a local bank), and even observes its own public holidays, distinct from the national calendar. It manages its own infrastructure, security, and medical services, operating largely independently of the national and provincial governments, though residents still pay taxes to the South African state.
Orania’s existence continues to be a subject of intense debate within South Africa and internationally. Critics argue that it undermines the principles of non-racialism and equality enshrined in the post-apartheid constitution, effectively creating a modern-day form of segregation. They contend that while cultural preservation is a valid right, it should not be used as a pretext for racial exclusion. Political parties and civil society organizations in South Africa frequently call for the integration or dismantling of such enclaves, viewing them as a betrayal of the “Rainbow Nation” ideal.
Conversely, Orania’s residents and supporters maintain that they are simply exercising their constitutional right to cultural self-determination in a space where they can safeguard their heritage, language, and values, which they believe are under threat in the broader South African society. They emphasize their self-sufficiency and low crime rates as evidence of a successful community model.
Orania remains a complex and controversial symbol in South Africa – a place that embodies both the challenges and aspirations of a nation still grappling with its past while striving for a truly inclusive future. Its continued existence highlights the ongoing tension between individual and group rights, and the delicate balance required to reconcile historical injustices with the promise of a united and equitable society.
Watch the full episode from a Ghanaian Youtuber Below:
Source: http://thepressradio.com
