Home / POLITICS / WATCH: How Bagbin urged MPs to go to court over Deputy Speakers’ voting rights on Feb. 15

WATCH: How Bagbin urged MPs to go to court over Deputy Speakers’ voting rights on Feb. 15

Supreme Court hands down landmark ruling on Deputy Speakers

Minority expresses stiff opposition to verdict allowing Deputy Speakers to vote

Majority and presidency celebrate vote as victory for democracy

On February 15, 2022; Speaker of Parliament Alban Bagbin returned to the House after a medical checkup in the United Arab Emirates.

He left Accra for Dubai on January 29 and was back to preside over sittings. When he arrived in the chamber and after the prayer session, he got down to business.

Bagbin read two belated pieces of communication from the presidency relative to travels by Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo informing him (the House for that matter) about travels to Ethiopia for the Ordinary Session of the African Union and a 10-day official trip across Europe and to Guyana.

Bagbin then proceeded to explain why there was the need to streamline channels of communication especially from the Presidency to the House and vice versa.

It brought him to a topical point at the time relative to whether or not Deputy Speakers should have voting rights. He urged MPs to work at seeking interpretation of existing rules from the courts.

“So, I would want to urge you all to still continue to maintain cool-heads. Let us think through these matters together and find solutions to some of the conceptual challenges that the Constitution has imposed on the country,” he stated.

What Bagbin said in full:

“In view of the fact that there are issues about Deputy Speaker, whether he is acting Speaker, his right to vote or not to vote. I am happy that some Members of Parliament are involved in trying to get clarification on these constitutional matters from the courts.

“Some of you have proceeded by issuing original writs at the courts for interpretation; they are welcoming developments because at the end of the day, we will be guided on these matters.

“These are new grounds, and this is the time for us to learn and improve on our system. So, I would want to urge you all to still continue to maintain cool-heads.

Let us think through these matters together and find solutions to some of the conceptual challenges that the Constitution has imposed on the country.”

Watch his presentation below between 13:40 seconds – 15 minutes mark

Contemporary background: SC ruling and opposition fightback

Following controversy over the rejection and later approval of the 2022 budget by one-sided Caucuses of the 8th Parliament, a private legal practitioner, Justice Abdulai, filed a case against at the Attorney General at the Supreme Court.

He prayed the Court to interpret two Articles – 102 and 104 – of the 1992 Constitution and by so doing to declare the proceedings in Parliament on November 30, 2021, which led to the passage of the 2022 Budget and Economic Policy as unconstitutional.

He specifically cited the fact that the Presiding Speaker, First Deputy Speaker, Joseph Osei-Owusu, had counted his vote despite acting as Speaker.

However, in defence of the State, the Attorney-General, Godfred Yeboah Dame, argued that there was no express provision in the 1992 Constitution that stops a Deputy Speaker presiding over proceedings from voting or counting himself as part of MPs present to form the right quorum.

The Minority have expressly rejected the decision with Leader Haruna Iddrisu referring to it as repugnant to the provisions in Article 102 and 104.

“The Court’s ruling aptly captures the judicial support for the Electronic Transaction Levy (E-levy), for a struggling economy in destress,” he said.

“The Judiciary of Ghana is also failing Ghana’s parliamentary democracy in their inability to appreciate the true meaning of Article 110 of the 1992 Constitution that Parliament shall, by Standing Orders, regulate its own proceedings.”

The Speaker of Parliament, Alban Bagbin, on March 11, 2022 issued a statement reacting to the two other arms of government – the Judiciary (via the Supreme Court) and to the Executive (specifically President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo).

Bagbin’s statement was released via Parliament’s official Facebook page 48 hours after the Supreme Court handed down a landmark ruling on the voting rights of Deputy Speakers of Parliament.

It also came barely 24 hours after President Akufo-Addo had formally commented on the ruling that said Deputy Speakers could vote and form part of quorum for business in the House.

The ruling also struck out a portion of Parliament’s Standing Orders that barred Deputy Speakers from voting.

GhanaWeb looks at the major issues Bagbin addressed

Motivation to comment

The Speaker suggested that he would ordinarily had stayed off commenting on the issue but for Akufo-Addo’s comment where he specifically said Parliament was not above the law and should not act as such.

“I have resisted the temptation of making a comment on the judgment of the Supreme Court on the issue of the voting rights of Deputy Speakers when presiding. But the unfortunate and myopic comment of the President has compelled me to let it out,” the statement read.

Scathing opinion on the verdict

Among others, Bagbin used words like absurd, reckless, troubling to describe the verdict of the Justice Jones Dotse-led bench.

“The SC decision, is to say the least, not only an absurdity but a reckless incursion into the remit of Parliament. The trend of unanimity is equally troubling. It doesn’t help explore and expand our legal jurisprudence,” the statement observed.

Read the full ruling of the Supreme Court below:

Source: www.ghanaweb.com

About admin

Check Also

Techiman South NDC chairman locks up party office over suspension

The National Democratic Congress (NDC) chairman of Techiman South constituency in the Bono East region …

John Mahama, Inusah Fuseini pop up in new documents on Achimota Forest Reserve

Former President John Dramani Mahama‘s name has been cited in a new document by the …

Houses, lands, guns, bank accounts: Here are the 75 properties in Sir John’s last Will

Sir John’s Last Will triggers social media outrage Government declassifies portions of Achimota Forest reserve …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com