A heated controversy has erupted after NPP communications officer, Gyewu-Appiah, made comments linking the funeral proceedings of former minister Omane Boamah to alleged “occultic” practices. His statements have drawn widespread criticism from political commentators, party members, and the general public, prompting calls for clarification and restraint.
During a recent media engagement, Gyewu-Appiah reportedly suggested that certain aspects of the funeral rituals had connections to occult practices. While he did not name specific individuals or groups, his remarks were interpreted as an insinuation against political figures and participants involved in the funeral proceedings.
The statement quickly sparked a backlash, with critics arguing that such claims are unfounded, inflammatory, and potentially harmful to social cohesion. Many observers noted that funerals are deeply personal and culturally significant events, and public speculation about occult involvement is considered disrespectful and inappropriate.
The reaction from both the public and political actors has been swift. Some party members expressed concern that Gyewu-Appiah’s comments could undermine the NPP’s image, especially at a time when Ghanaian politics is highly scrutinized by the media and citizens. Social media users also weighed in, describing the comments as irresponsible and sensationalist. Several opinion leaders urged political figures to exercise caution when discussing sensitive cultural and ceremonial matters, emphasizing the need for respectful discourse.
Ghanaian funerals, particularly those involving public figures like Omane Boamah, are often elaborate and rich in traditional rites and customs. Scholars and cultural commentators argue that labeling these rituals as “occultic” without evidence misrepresents Ghanaian cultural practices and risks inflaming tensions. Experts also stress that public statements about funerals and traditional practices must be handled sensitively, given the potential for misinterpretation in a politically charged environment.
In response to the backlash, Gyewu-Appiah has defended his comments, claiming that his intention was to highlight unusual practices, not to accuse specific individuals or groups of wrongdoing. However, critics remain unconvinced, arguing that public figures have a responsibility to communicate carefully and avoid statements that could be seen as conspiratorial or divisive.
This incident highlights the delicate intersection of politics, culture, and public commentary in Ghana. Political communicators are often expected to offer analysis and opinions, but there is a fine line between commentary and statements that may offend cultural norms or public sensibilities. Observers also note that statements like these can have long-term consequences for political credibility, particularly when they are widely circulated on social media and traditional news outlets. Maintaining a respectful tone in public discourse is seen as essential to preserving trust and social cohesion.
The controversy has prompted calls for greater media literacy and responsible communication among political operatives. Experts recommend that political statements about funerals, cultural practices, or sensitive social issues should be factual, respectful, and free of sensationalist language. Analysts warn that failing to do so can not only damage political reputations but also deepen divisions within communities, particularly during periods of mourning or national reflection.
The fallout from Gyewu-Appiah’s comments on the Omane Boamah funeral underscores the need for careful public communication in politically sensitive contexts. While political commentary is a vital part of democratic discourse, it must be balanced with cultural respect, sensitivity, and factual accuracy. As the discussion continues, many hope that political figures will take the opportunity to engage more responsibly, avoiding language that could inflame tensions or misrepresent Ghanaian traditions.
An NPP communicator, Benjamin Gyewu-Appiah, popularly known as Benghazi, has described the ruling National Democratic Congress (NDC) as “cultic” and “demonic,” alleging that the party visited a sacred place to secure political power.
According to him, the heavy rains and strong… pic.twitter.com/Vg2nQhs8qs
— EDHUB🌍ℹ (@eddie_wrt) December 16, 2025
An NPP communicator, Benjamin Gyewu-Appiah, popularly known as Benghazi, has described the ruling National Democratic Congress (NDC) as “cultic” and “demonic,” alleging that the party visited a sacred place to secure political power.
According to him, the heavy rains and strong… pic.twitter.com/Vg2nQhs8qs
— EDHUB🌍ℹ (@eddie_wrt) December 16, 2025
An NPP communicator, Benjamin Gyewu-Appiah, popularly known as Benghazi, has described the ruling National Democratic Congress (NDC) as “cultic” and “demonic,” alleging that the party visited a sacred place to secure political power.
According to him, the heavy rains and strong… pic.twitter.com/Vg2nQhs8qs
— EDHUB🌍ℹ (@eddie_wrt) December 16, 2025
An NPP communicator, Benjamin Gyewu-Appiah, popularly known as Benghazi, has described the ruling National Democratic Congress (NDC) as “cultic” and “demonic,” alleging that the party visited a sacred place to secure political power.
According to him, the heavy rains and strong… pic.twitter.com/Vg2nQhs8qs
— EDHUB🌍ℹ (@eddie_wrt) December 16, 2025
Source: Thepressradio.com
