The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Regional Integration has issued a press statement categorically denying any approval, directive, or engagement regarding the extension of Driver and Vehicle Licensing Authority (DVLA) services to foreign countries.
According to the Ministry, there has never been any official policy decision, ministerial directive, or institutional engagement to support such an initiative.
But Ghanaians remember differently.
In May 2025, the DVLA Chief Executive Officer publicly announced that he had met with the Shirley Ayorkor Botchwey, then Minister for Foreign Affairs, to discuss preparations for rolling out DVLA services abroad. The announcement was not informal or speculative. It was presented as an official policy direction.
The DVLA leadership explicitly referenced plans for a pilot programme in six countries, with the expectation of expansion to other jurisdictions. Photographs from the meeting were publicly shared, and the communication was framed as the beginning of a structured international service rollout for Ghanaians in the diaspora.
At the time, the message to the public was clear:
This was not an idea — it was a policy process in motion.
Now, in February 2026, the Ministry’s position is that there was no approval, no directive, no engagement, and no policy — effectively denying the existence of the very discussions that were previously made public.
This is not a minor communication gap.
It is a direct contradiction.
If the 2025 announcement was inaccurate, then a senior public official misled the Ghanaian public.
If the discussions genuinely took place, then the Ministry’s denial of engagement is misleading.
If the policy direction was later abandoned, then the public deserves transparency — not denial.
Public trust is not built on selective memory or institutional amnesia. It is built on consistency, honesty, and accountability.
Governance requires more than issuing statements; it requires reconciling records, clarifying contradictions, and providing factual explanations. A government institution cannot simply erase publicly documented engagements because policy direction has changed or political priorities have shifted.
The Ghanaian public is owed a clear, detailed explanation:
-
Were meetings held between the DVLA leadership and the Foreign Affairs Minister in 2025?
-
Was a pilot programme discussed?
-
Were international service expansions formally proposed?
-
If so, what happened to the policy process?
-
Who authorized the public communication?
-
And why is it now being denied?
These are not partisan questions.
They are questions of institutional credibility.
Leadership demands accountability. When credibility is compromised at ministerial level, it ceases to be a communication issue and becomes a governance issue. Where contradictions exist between public records and official denials, leadership has a duty to clarify — not deflect.
If those contradictions cannot be convincingly reconciled, then responsibility must be taken. In democratic governance, accountability is not weakness — it is integrity.
Ghanaians deserve more than statements.
They deserve truth, clarity, and honest leadership.
